Rejuran Pore Tightening Toner Pad tub
Promising for Large Pores
What Makes This Different

It delivers the brand's multi-acid pore-care concept in a convenient pad — salicylic, betaine salicylate, gluconolactone and lactic acids plus niacinamide and conditioning c-PDRN — and crucially leaves out the photosensitizing essential oils found in the matching ampoule, making it the cleaner, more sensitive-friendly of the two.

Rejuran

Rejuran Pore Tightening Toner Pad Review

Fragrance-Free Pore Pad
toner pad k beauty Paraben Free Cruelty Free

The pad version of Rejuran's multi-acid pore concept, and crucially the cleaner of the two: salicylic, betaine salicylate, gluconolactone and lactic acids plus niacinamide and conditioning c-PDRN, all fragrance-free — without the photosensitizing essential oils that mar the matching ampoule. It refines pores and texture on oily skin in a convenient pad. The acid load is the main caveat for the very reactive, but otherwise it's a sensible, good-value exfoliating step.

$29.00
60 pads (220ml)
4.3 ★★★★★
300 reviews
Made in South Korea Launched 2024 Best for summer PAO: 12 months
Buy at Amazon ♥
Run it through our tools Clashes with my routine? Pregnancy-safe? Find a cheaper dupe Patch-test it first

Part of Rejuran's 2024 pore-care line and riding the brand's c-PDRN reputation, this toner pad's score reflects its formulation — a fragrance-free multi-acid blend with niacinamide, soothing botanicals and conditioning extras — alongside a growing base of retailer reviews rather than independent long-term data. Its broader performance over time continues to be established.

Verdicts

How well it fits each concern

Verdict by concern tap a concern for the case

Promisingfor Large PoresNiacinamide has trial-level evidence for large pores but no guideline or regulatory standing yet — promising, short of a recommendation; the other actives here are not yet assessed for it.Moderate evidenceGentleNo reviews collected yet

The case for it

  1. Niacinamide has trial-level evidence for this concern but no guideline or regulatory standing yet.
  2. It is plausibly present at a working level, though the concentration is not declared.
  3. The formula carries none of the triggers this concern is sensitive to.

What would change this: A declared concentration would move this to a firmer reading of the dose.

Same rule for everyone. “Promising” is the verdict on 7,858 of 45,024 concern verdicts across the catalog; rule R9p decided 7,858 of them. Unchanged since September 5, 2026, engine 5.1.1.

Brand or formulator? Disclose a concentration or correct a fact →

Show the work
Rule
R9p — 0.5.0: 'Unproven' beside three filled dots read as one question answered twice with opposite words (7,018 rows). The chip measures standing, the dots measure trial volume; where the row carries at least one RCT or a tier-2 source (moderate dots) and the active is present at a working level, the honest word is Promising. Unproven is reserved for plausible-standing rows with limited or weak evidence, or an under-dosed form. Same rank as Unproven — a bet either way; the dots order them. · the full register
Carrying active
Niacinamide
Standing
plausible — trials support it
Form
plausible — studied range 4%, from the trials on the row; needs leave-on contact; judge it after ~8 weeks
Tolerability
gentle
Row checked
against its sources on July 17, 2026 (evidence table ev-2026.09-r228)

The studies behind the evidence row

All large pores products →
Promisingfor Excess OilinessNiacinamide has trial-level evidence for excess oiliness but no guideline or regulatory standing yet — promising, short of a recommendation; the other actives here are not yet assessed for it.Moderate evidenceStandard tolerabilityNo reviews collected yet

The case for it

  1. Niacinamide has trial-level evidence for this concern but no guideline or regulatory standing yet.
  2. It is plausibly present at a working level, though the concentration is not declared.
  3. The formula carries no trigger this concern is sensitive to, with the cautions noted.

Cautions: fungal-acne triggers.

What would change this: A declared concentration would move this to a firmer reading of the dose.

Same rule for everyone. “Promising” is the verdict on 7,858 of 45,024 concern verdicts across the catalog; rule R9p decided 7,858 of them. Unchanged since September 5, 2026, engine 5.1.1.

Brand or formulator? Disclose a concentration or correct a fact →

Show the work
Rule
R9p — 0.5.0: 'Unproven' beside three filled dots read as one question answered twice with opposite words (7,018 rows). The chip measures standing, the dots measure trial volume; where the row carries at least one RCT or a tier-2 source (moderate dots) and the active is present at a working level, the honest word is Promising. Unproven is reserved for plausible-standing rows with limited or weak evidence, or an under-dosed form. Same rank as Unproven — a bet either way; the dots order them. · the full register
Carrying active
Niacinamide
Standing
plausible — trials support it
Form
plausible — studied range 2%, from the trials on the row; needs leave-on contact; judge it after ~8 weeks
Tolerability
standard — fungal triggers
Row checked
against its sources on July 17, 2026 (evidence table ev-2026.09-r228)

The studies behind the evidence row

All excess oiliness products →
Good choicefor Rough TextureSalicylic Acid is a reference standard by mechanism for rough texture; this pad carries it.Moderate evidenceGentleNo reviews collected yet

The case for it

  1. Multi-Acid Exfoliating Blend has trial-supported standing for this concern.
  2. It is plausibly present at a working level, though the concentration is not declared.
  3. The formula carries none of the triggers this concern is sensitive to.

What would change this: A declared concentration would move this to a firmer reading of the dose.

Same rule for everyone. “Good choice” is the verdict on 9,564 of 45,024 concern verdicts across the catalog; rule R5 decided 9,072 of them. Unchanged since September 5, 2026, engine 5.1.1.

Brand or formulator? Disclose a concentration or correct a fact →

Show the work
Rule
R5 — Trial-supported or guideline-supported active, adequately or plausibly dosed. · the full register
Carrying active
Multi-Acid Exfoliating Blend
Standing
supported — its mechanism is established
Form
plausible — studied range 0.5–2%, from the trials on the row; needs leave-on contact; judge it after ~6 weeks
Tolerability
gentle
Row checked
against its sources on July 17, 2026 (evidence table ev-2026.09-r228)

The studies behind the evidence row

  • International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary and Handbook — declared function — Personal Care Products Council
  • United States Pharmacopeia / National Formulary — excipient monograph — USP-NF
All rough texture products →
Strong choicefor BlackheadsSalicylic Acid is an approved or monograph active for blackheads; this pad carries it, though the concentration is not declared.Moderate evidenceStandard tolerabilityNo reviews collected yet

The case for it

  1. Multi-Acid Exfoliating Blend is a first-line active — approved, monograph-listed or named in current guidelines — for this concern.
  2. It is plausibly present at a working level, though the concentration is not declared.
  3. The formula carries no trigger this concern is sensitive to, with the cautions noted.

Cautions: fungal-acne triggers.

What would change this: A declared concentration would move this to a firmer reading of the dose.

Same rule for everyone. “Strong choice” is the verdict on 1,459 of 45,024 concern verdicts across the catalog; rule R3 decided 567 of them. Unchanged since September 5, 2026, engine 5.1.1.

Brand or formulator? Disclose a concentration or correct a fact →

Show the work
Rule
R3 — Undeclared but plausibly dosed (top-third INCI position, or a potent sub-1% active) — the verdict stands, and the sentence says what disclosure would add. A declared figure below range would have been sub-threshold. · the full register
Carrying active
Multi-Acid Exfoliating Blend
Standing
first line — a regulator recognises it for this use; trials support it · per 21 CFR § 333.350 - Labeling of acne drug products. (US Code of Federal Regulations (Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School)), opened July 27, 2026
Form
plausible — studied range 0.5–2%, from the OTC monograph or label; judge it after ~6 weeks
Tolerability
standard — fungal triggers
Row checked
against its sources on July 27, 2026 (evidence table ev-2026.09-r228)

The studies behind the evidence row

All blackheads products →
Strong choicefor AcneSalicylic Acid is an approved or monograph active for acne; this pad carries it, though the concentration is not declared.Moderate evidenceStandard tolerabilityNo reviews collected yet

The case for it

  1. Multi-Acid Exfoliating Blend is a first-line active — approved, monograph-listed or named in current guidelines — for this concern.
  2. It is plausibly present at a working level, though the concentration is not declared.
  3. The formula carries no trigger this concern is sensitive to, with the cautions noted.

Cautions: fungal-acne triggers.

What would change this: A declared concentration would move this to a firmer reading of the dose.

Same rule for everyone. “Strong choice” is the verdict on 1,459 of 45,024 concern verdicts across the catalog; rule R3 decided 567 of them. Unchanged since September 5, 2026, engine 5.1.1.

Brand or formulator? Disclose a concentration or correct a fact →

Show the work
Rule
R3 — Undeclared but plausibly dosed (top-third INCI position, or a potent sub-1% active) — the verdict stands, and the sentence says what disclosure would add. A declared figure below range would have been sub-threshold. · the full register
Carrying active
Multi-Acid Exfoliating Blend
Standing
first line — a regulator recognises it for this use; trials support it · per § 333.310 Acne active ingredients. (U.S. Food and Drug Administration — 21 CFR Part 333 Subpart D (Topical Acne Drug Products), Code of Federal Regulations via GovInfo), opened July 27, 2026
Form
plausible — studied range 0.5–2%, from the OTC monograph or label; judge it after ~6 weeks
Tolerability
standard — fungal triggers
Row checked
against its sources on July 27, 2026 (evidence table ev-2026.09-r228)

The studies behind the evidence row

All acne products →

Also listed for Dullness — the actives here (Niacinamide, Houttuynia Cordata (Heartleaf) are in our research queue for that concern; there is no verdict until their evidence rows are written. That is a gap in our table, not a mark against the product.

Does the jobDoes what a toner is for: not alcohol-driven, adds something real. Not measured from the label: restores skin pH, plays well with what follows.

A verdict is DermApproved’s assessment of how well a product’s ingredients fit a concern — never a claim about what the product treats. Evidence dots and collected reviews sit beside it and are never blended in. Rules 0.5.1 · evidence table ev-2026.09-r228 · how we decide

Assessment

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓ Layered AHA-PHA-BHA blend refines pores and texture effectively
  • ✓ Fragrance-free, unlike the matching ampoule
  • ✓ No photosensitizing citrus or lavender oils
  • ✓ Niacinamide helps regulate oil and supports tone
  • ✓ Soothing houttuynia, calendula and aloe buffer the acids
  • ✓ Convenient, hygienic daily pad format
  • ✓ Good value for a multi-acid exfoliating pad

Cons

  • ✗ Multi-acid load can sting sensitive or dry skin
  • ✗ Still requires diligent daily sunscreen
  • ✗ Premium price relative to basic exfoliating pads
  • ✗ Contains silicones some prefer to avoid
  • ✗ Fungal-acne-prone users should approach with caution
Review

Full Review

If the Rejuran Pore Tightening Ampoule was a good product undermined by a self-inflicted formulation flaw — those photosensitizing bergamot, grapefruit and lavender oils — then the Pore Tightening Toner Pad is, in the most important respect, the version they got right. Same brand, same multi-acid pore-care concept, same c-PDRN signature, but with one decisive difference: the pads are fragrance-free, and they leave out the phototoxic citrus and lavender oils entirely. For anyone deciding between the two formats, that single fact should settle it, and it's where this review has to start.

The pore-care logic carries over intact and effective. The pads are soaked in a layered acid blend: salicylic acid and betaine salicylate (oil-soluble BHAs that get into pores), gluconolactone (a gentle PHA), and lactic acid (an AHA for the surface). That multi-acid approach refines pores and smooths texture by clearing congestion at different levels, and in a daily-use pad format it's both convenient and genuinely effective for oily, congested skin. Niacinamide sits fifth, helping regulate sebum and support tone, and the whole thing is built to gently exfoliate and clarify with each swipe.

What makes the pads tolerable rather than stripping is a thoughtful soothing-and-conditioning layer. Houttuynia cordata, calendula and aloe sit high in the list for calming, and there's the brand's c-PDRN alongside antioxidants — beta-carotene, vitamin E, carrot and grape seed oils — plus a touch of conditioning lipids. Crucially, none of these soothers are undercut by added fragrance or essential oils this time. The result is a multi-acid pad that exfoliates effectively while keeping the skin reasonably comfortable, which is exactly what the ampoule was trying to do before the citrus oils got in the way.

The format itself is a genuine convenience. Pre-soaked pads in a tub make daily exfoliation frictionless — you grab one, sweep it over cleansed skin, and you're done — and the spatula-and-lid design keeps them hygienic and moist. For building a consistent pore-care habit, that ease matters, because the acids only work if you actually use them regularly. It slots neatly into a routine as a quick exfoliating-and-toning step after cleansing.

The caveats are the standard ones for any acid exfoliant, minus the ampoule's extra baggage. This is still a genuine multi-acid product, so it's not for everyone: sensitive, reactive, rosacea-prone or dry skin can find the acid load too much, and even oily skin should introduce the pads slowly — a few times a week to start — and avoid stacking them with other strong acids or retinoids on the same night. And as with any exfoliant, the acids raise sun sensitivity, so daily sunscreen is non-negotiable. But notably, without the phototoxic citrus oils, the sun-sensitivity concern here is the ordinary acid one rather than the compounded, avoidable risk the ampoule carried.

The usual pore reality check applies: pore size is largely genetic, so the pads make pores look clearer and more refined by clearing them and toning the skin, but they don't permanently shrink them. Set that expectation and the refinement is a real, satisfying, if reversible, benefit. As a daily clarifying step for oily, pore-prone skin, they do exactly what they should.

Value is reasonable. At around twenty-nine dollars for a tub of sixty pads, the per-use cost is low for a multi-acid exfoliating pad with niacinamide and a conditioning deck, and the convenience earns its keep. It's priced as a premium pad but not extravagantly, and the fragrance-free formulation genuinely broadens who can use it relative to the ampoule.

The existence of two near-identical products that differ chiefly in whether they contain phototoxic oils raises a useful question about how brands make formulation decisions, and what it means for shoppers. It's unlikely Rejuran set out to make one good and one flawed version; more probably the ampoule and the pads were developed on slightly different timelines or by different formulation briefs, and the citrus-and-lavender oils made it into one and not the other. But the practical upshot for a customer is real: faced with a brand's range, you can't assume consistency, and the only way to know which products are cleanly formulated is to read each ingredient list individually. Here that diligence pays off concretely — the pads and the ampoule promise the same thing, cost similar amounts, and come from the same line, yet one is meaningfully better formulated than the other. Brand loyalty is no substitute for reading the label, and this pair is a tidy little demonstration of why.

The verdict is clear and comparative. If you have oily or combination, pore-prone skin and you want a convenient, effective multi-acid exfoliating pad to refine pores and texture, these are a sensible, good-value choice — and between Rejuran's two pore-care products, they're the one to buy, precisely because they drop the photosensitizing oils that compromised the ampoule. If your skin is dry, sensitive or rosacea-prone, the acid load still makes them a cautious pick, and you'd want to patch test and ease in. But for the right skin, the toner pads are the cleaner, smarter expression of the brand's pore concept, and a reminder that sometimes the best version of a product is the one that left the wrong ingredients out.

Formula

Key Ingredients

The hero actives that drive this product's performance.

IngredientFunctionEvidence
Multi-Acid Exfoliating Blend Salicylic acid and betaine salicylate (BHAs), gluconolactone (PHA) and lactic acid (AHA) form a layered acid blend that exfoliates the surface and inside pores as the pad sweeps, the engine behind the pore-refining, texture-smoothing claim. Established mechanism for Rough Texture · established mechanism
Niacinamide Sitting fifth, niacinamide helps regulate sebum and supports the barrier and tone, complementing the acids in keeping pores clearer and skin more even with daily use. Limited for Large Pores
Houttuynia & Calendula Soothing Complex Houttuynia, calendula and aloe high in the list provide soothing that buffers the acid blend, keeping the exfoliating pads calmer and suiting blemish-prone skin. Not yet assessed
c-PDRN (Hydrolyzed DNA) & Antioxidants The brand's signature c-PDRN with antioxidant beta-carotene, vitamin E and carrot and grape seed oils adds a conditioning, protective layer so the pads exfoliate without simply stripping. Not yet assessed
Full INCI List

Water, Dipropylene Glycol, Butylene Glycol, Glycerin, Niacinamide, Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice, Calendula Officinalis Flower Extract, Cornus Officinalis Fruit Extract, Houttuynia Cordata Extract, Hydroxyacetophenone, Tromethamine, Polyglyceryl-10 Laurate, Salicylic Acid, Gluconolactone, Caprylyl Glycol, Lactic Acid, Carbomer, 1,2-Hexanediol, Ammonium Acryloyldimethyltaurate/VP Copolymer, Ethylhexylglycerin, Xanthan Gum, Tocopherol, Adenosine, Cellulose Gum, Laminaria Japonica Extract, Hydrolyzed DNA, Betaine Salicylate, Sodium Phytate, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Dimethicone, Diisopropyl Sebacate, Diethylhexyl Succinate, Vitis Vinifera (Grape) Seed Oil, Citric Acid, Daucus Carota Sativa (Carrot) Seed Oil, Tocopheryl Acetate, Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Oil, Daucus Carota Sativa (Carrot) Extract, Disodium EDTA, Beta-Carotene

Safety & Formulation Facts
✓ Pregnancy Safe ✓ Fragrance Free✓ Alcohol Free✗ Oil Free✗ Silicone Free✓ Paraben Free✓ Sulfate Free✓ Cruelty Free✗ Vegan✗ Fungal Acne Safe
Potential Irritants
Salicylic AcidLactic Acid
Compatibility

Skin Match

Best For
Works For
Not Ideal For
Routine Step

treatment

Time of Day

AM & PM

Layering Tips

Sweep a pad over cleansed skin as a gentle exfoliating-and-toning step; start a few times a week, avoid pairing with other strong acids the same night, and follow with moisturizer and daytime sunscreen.

Results Timeline

Skin feels smoother and looks fresher within one to two weeks; clearer, more refined pores build over four to eight weeks of consistent, measured use.

Pairs Well With
niacinamidegluconolactonecentella-asiaticahyaluronic-acid
Planning a combo? Check it against what you already use
Conflicts With
retinoidsstrong-acids
See where it fits — layering order & night-splitting
Sample AM Routine
  1. Cleanser
  2. THIS PRODUCT (pad)
  3. Hydrating serum
  4. Oil-free moisturizer
  5. Sunscreen
Sample PM Routine
  1. Cleanser
  2. THIS PRODUCT (pad)
  3. Soothing serum
  4. Moisturizer
Evidence

Science & Expert Perspective

The Science

The pads deliver effective pore refinement through a layered, well-evidenced acid blend in a fragrance-free base. Salicylic acid and betaine salicylate are lipophilic beta-hydroxy acids that penetrate sebum-rich follicles to clear congestion, gluconolactone is a gentler polyhydroxy acid with humectant properties, and lactic acid is an alpha-hydroxy acid for surface exfoliation — together a sound multi-target approach to texture and pore appearance. Niacinamide is well evidenced for sebum regulation, barrier support and tone. The soothing layer — houttuynia cordata, calendula and aloe — has reasonable anti-inflammatory evidence and buffers the acids, and antioxidants beta-carotene, tocopherol and carrot and grape seed oils add protective and conditioning support, with c-PDRN as an emerging topical extra. Critically, and unlike the matching ampoule, the formula omits photosensitizing citrus and lavender oils and any added fragrance, materially lowering irritation and sun-reaction risk. The acids do inherently increase photosensitivity, so sunscreen remains essential. The honest scientific read is an effective, more cleanly-formulated multi-acid pore treatment whose benefits are real and whose irritation risk is the ordinary one of acid exfoliation.

Dermatologist Perspective

Multi-acid exfoliating toner pads combining BHAs, a PHA and an AHA with niacinamide and soothing botanicals are generally well regarded in clinical practice for oily, congested and pore-prone skin, and this fragrance-free formulation is a cleaner, more sensible choice than the brand's matching ampoule, which contains photosensitizing citrus oils. Dermatology guidance would note that the acids still raise sun sensitivity, making daily sunscreen essential, and that sensitive, rosacea-prone or dry skin should approach the acid load cautiously, introducing the pads gradually and avoiding concurrent use with other strong acids or retinoids. The soothing houttuynia, calendula and aloe help buffer the exfoliation, and the omission of fragrance and essential oils is a genuine advantage for tolerability. As always, pore size is largely genetic, so the effect is cosmetic refinement rather than permanent change, and clinicians would view the pads as a reasonable daily clarifying step for appropriate skin within a sun-protective routine.

Guidance

Usage & Recommendations

How to Use

After cleansing, take one pad and sweep it gently over the face, avoiding the eye area, as an exfoliating-and-toning step. Begin a few times a week rather than daily, especially if you're new to acids, and increase frequency only as your skin tolerates the multi-acid blend. Avoid layering the pads with other strong acids or retinoids in the same routine to prevent over-exfoliation, and always follow with a moisturizer. Because the acids raise sun sensitivity, daily broad-spectrum sunscreen is essential whenever you use them. Keep the tub closed and use the spatula for hygiene, and patch test first if your skin is reactive.

Value Assessment

At around twenty-nine dollars for a tub of sixty pads, the per-use cost is low for a multi-acid exfoliating pad carrying niacinamide, soothing botanicals and a conditioning antioxidant-and-c-PDRN deck, and the convenience of a daily pad earns its keep. It's priced as a premium pad but not extravagantly, and the fragrance-free formulation genuinely broadens its appeal relative to the ampoule. Between Rejuran's two pore-care products, the pads offer the better value precisely because they drop the photosensitizing oils, delivering the effective acid blend without the avoidable liability. The main exception is dry or sensitive skin that finds the acid load too much, for whom a gentler single-acid exfoliant would be the wiser spend.

Who Should Buy

Choose them if you have oily or combination, pore-prone skin and want a convenient, effective, fragrance-free multi-acid exfoliating pad to refine pores and texture. Between Rejuran's two pore products, they're the one to pick, since they deliver the acid blend without the matching ampoule's photosensitizing oils.

Who Should Skip

They're a cautious pick if your skin is dry, sensitive or rosacea-prone, since the multi-acid load can sting and over-exfoliate — patch test and ease in, or choose a gentler single-acid exfoliant. Those who avoid silicones, or who won't commit to daily sunscreen, should also look elsewhere.

Ready to try Rejuran Pore Tightening Toner Pad?

Buy at Amazon ♥
Details

Product Details

Texture

Pads soaked in a watery, lightly slippery essence that sweeps cleanly and leaves a fresh, lightly exfoliated finish.

Scent

Fragrance-free, with only a faint neutral note.

Packaging

A 220ml tub of 60 pads with a spatula; keep the lid closed to keep the pads moist.

Finish
lightweightfast-absorbingnon-greasy
What to Expect on First Use

The first use feels cool and refreshing as the pad sweeps the skin; the multi-acid blend is moderate, so those new to acids should ease in, but the fragrance-free formula is gentler than the matching ampoule.

How Long It Lasts

About a month of daily single-pad use, longer used a few times a week, from the 60-pad tub.

Period After Opening

12 months

Opened yours? Track the toss-by date
Best Season

summer

Certifications
Cruelty-Free
Background

The Story Behind This Product

It's the pad format of Rejuran's Pore Tightening line, pairing the brand's c-PDRN with a multi-acid pore-care deck in a grab-and-go, fragrance-free exfoliating pad.

About Rejuran Established Brand (5–20 years)

Rejuran is the cosmetic line of Korean biotech firm PharmaResearch, known for its clinic-administered polynucleotide injectables. These pore pads pair the brand's c-PDRN with a multi-acid exfoliating deck and niacinamide; unlike the matching ampoule, the pads are fragrance-free, giving them a cleaner, more sensitive-skin-friendly profile in keeping with the clinical positioning.

Brand founded: 2014 · Product launched: 2024
Myth vs. Reality

Common Myths

Myth

These pads permanently tighten or shrink pores.

Reality

Pore size is largely genetic; the acids clear congestion and the astringent botanicals make pores look temporarily refined, but the effect reverses if you stop — the pads clarify and refine rather than permanently shrinking pores.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the Rejuran Pore Tightening Toner Pads do?

They're multi-acid exfoliating pads: salicylic and betaine salicylate BHAs, gluconolactone PHA and lactic AHA refine pores and texture, with niacinamide for oil control, soothing houttuynia and calendula, and conditioning c-PDRN and antioxidants.

How do these pads differ from the Pore Tightening Ampoule?

Same multi-acid pore-care concept, but the pads are fragrance-free and leave out the photosensitizing bergamot, grapefruit and lavender oils found in the ampoule, making them the cleaner, more sensitive-skin-friendly of the two.

Are the pads exfoliating?

Yes — they contain a layered AHA-PHA-BHA acid blend, so they gently exfoliate as you sweep. Start a few times a week, avoid other strong acids the same night, and always follow with daily sunscreen.

Are these pads fragrance-free?

Yes, the toner pads are fragrance-free, in keeping with Rejuran's clinical positioning, which makes them gentler than the matching ampoule despite the acid content.

Are the pads good for oily, pore-prone skin?

Yes — the multi-acid blend, niacinamide and oil-balancing focus suit oily and combination, pore-prone skin especially, while the soothing botanicals and conditioning c-PDRN keep them from being overly stripping.

Reviews

What Reviewers Tend to Say

Recurring themes our editors read across retailer reviews of this product — summaries in our words, not quotations, and not a substitute for your own patch test.

Common Praise

Convenient exfoliating pads

Fragrance-free, unlike the ampoule

Refines pores and texture

Niacinamide helps with oil

Soothing botanicals buffer the acids

Common Complaints

Acid load can sting sensitive skin

Premium price for pads

Requires daily sunscreen

Related Conditions
large poresexcess oilinessrough textureblackheadsdullness
Related Ingredients
salicylic acidniacinamidehouttuynia cordatapdrn